which my level of english?

I'd remove 'ain't' from your vocabulary, along with all'll (I think you mean all y'all). Those two words will close more doors than they will open.

You have a solid vocabulary, but your grammar, punctuation, and in some cases, your ability to effectively utilize that vocabulary are lacking. I also think that you're trying to write colloquially using a lot of slang and contractions, but I would recommend that you avoid writing this way until you're more familiar with the language's formal rules. Slang doesn't make you better at the language; rather, when you're comfortable with the language, slang will come naturally. Make sure that you're capitalizing the first letter in each sentence. It may not change the meaning, but it does affect how your writing comes across, and it makes it easier to read by clearly marking the beginning of a new sentence. Some of the sentences in there are quite confusing, your grammar and sentence structure make it hard to understand them. For example "*FR, there glances throw moronic people, which absolutely don't understand how AI work."* Is the "FR" meant to be an acronym for "*for real*"? If so, this isn't the place for it. Try to avoid acronyms, and certainly avoid starting your sentence with them. What is meant by "*these glances throw moronic people*"? With this structure, the word "*glances*" is being used as a noun, and they are throwing moronic people. Or "*however it couldn't fucked up if duded won't fucked up, feel me?"* I've very little idea of what this sentence means. Starting with "however" means that it's an exception, or a contradiction to the prior statement. You've combined future tense (couldn't/won't) with past tense (fucked up), meaning I don't know where this sentence takes place in time. I also don't know what "it" refers to here, as the previous statements didn't establish anything consistent. Does "it" refer to a nuclear bomb, to AI, to the theories? I will try my best to reconstruct your writing so that it's grammatically sound, but be warned that I might stray from your intended meaning in places where I couldn't understand it. **Bold letters** indicate changes and notes are (in parentheses). **W**ell let's start with a dark side, which revolve**s** around theories that suddenly we'll be unemploy**ed**. **These theories are shared by** moronic people, **who** absolutely don't understand how AI work**s**. **It isn't a** nuclear bomb in monkey's hands (not quite sure I get the meaning here, but grammatically it's fine), all **of** that shit was produced by people. **H**owever**,** it couldn't **have been** fucked up if **people** (maybe "dudes" would be fine, but "duded" isn't a word) **weren't** fucked up, **do you understand**? **S**o all **of** this evolution, **this** human adaptation, **those** who couldn't move through it and push forward would be destroyed**, shows that** all life is about pushing and stumbling, either **you** walk and talk or **you** die. **A**lso, **you hear** (I'm assuming you meant "hear" instead of "here". They sound the same, but have different meanings), about creativity and **how** human**s** **are** unique, **but** we're not. **T**here **isn't** randomly shit in the wor**l**d, all **will** produce new**er** and new**er** things. **Moreover** **I** believe that human**s are** just a complicat**ed** mechanism, **one that gains complexity** while **it's** alive (I'm not sure if I'm interpreting that correctly), **if you know what I mean**. **S**o AI can **follow** the same logic, **and** the "white page" of AI **will be** able to give us a future, **whether white or grey**, with a **more-or-less** stable situation. **Somewhat** **like** Iron Man**.** **M**ore **good** than **bad**. This discussion of AI seems to me to be a rather complex one for the level of English that you have. I recommend starting with simpler concepts to practice your grammar. Learn how to greet someone and how to ask and answer common questions.

Idk my levels But... A2? - You've got a large vocabulary and if you tried to use less of that - I'm guessing you'd be able to have basic conversation at an understandable level. The grammar and connecting words are rough, definitely need some work. I understood some sentences, but couldn't relate what I was reading to what was written before or after. As a whole, I thiiiiink I understand the idea your trying to get across, but It's near on illegible. If you work on grammar and the flow of words in English, you'll quickly hit B1(maybe) (Hopefully someone better versed here answers, I just seen there weren't many comments addressing the level part)

You speak like Pootie Tang lol. Sah da tay!

We will be unemployed..or better.. lose our jobs. Made/created by people..sounds better than produced in this context. You use first singular..then plural..  The human..is..but perhaps you meant.. the humans are.. If I have the time, I will post a reply with all the necessary corrections..  Level around B1. And most certainly some parts are kind of difficult to understand. But what is your native language? Because th answer to exactly this question can explain the way you used the words and give a context about why you used certain constructions that might sound good in your language, but not in English. I am not native speaker, btw.

You use intermediate vocabulary but the sentences don't make much sense.

If you were take a listening and reading test I suspect your score would reflect a relatively high level, but writing often lags. It is normal for someone learning any language to score much better on the "incoming" side than the "output" side. Don't let that discourage you, output improves with practice just as the input variables did when you were first starting out. If I understand your underlying message correctly, you are arguing that *AI will not destroy humanity - at least not as an inherent part of its existence. That AI was programmed by humans and that different AI systems will reflect the psychology of the people who programmed it, or the people whose creations (eg. essays, artwork, etc) were used to train the AI system; in other words, AI is an extension of all the aspects of humanity simply because it was created by humans. AI will certainly disrupt aspects of job markets, economies, and societies but (in both good and bad ways) humans will adapt and come to interact with AI the same way we do with new religions, cultures, or countries that have always formed and re-formed throughout history. We will find ways to adapt to having AI in our lives and cultures will find a new 'equilibrium' that includes AI systems just as we have all the other human-minded groups our ancestors have met throughout our history as a species.* My interpretation may be wrong, but as it stands now this is the underlying message I am taking from your essay. Did I get close to your intention or did I miss the target?

There's a lot of areas that I can't understand. After several re-reads, I might be able to get the gist of what you're saying, but it's difficult. Keep at it.

Judging by the word order and some specific words, are you Slavic? The correct word order in English is much stricter.

I recommend getting away from slang until you're extremely confident with word order and other grammar topics. You have to know the rules before you can break them.

To me that is incomprehensible, but I'm glad you're practicing!

A bit disorienting, but somewhat understandable. Keep going! I can tell your native language is slavic? russian or ukrainian is my guess. you use a lot of idioms and figurative language that doesn't translate very well.

You can test here. https://hoodenglisheveryday.dope-ar.com/learn.html

I would guess an A2 level of English. And “Nuclear bomb in monkey’s hands” is pretty funny, but you should just stick with “chimp with a machine gun”.

Looks translated word for word